The Science Museum Wants Their Plastic Samples. They Refused


After Gündoğdu found out about the Shell museum contract, he restated his decision. On Nov. 5 he emailed the curator informing them that — due to Shell’s museum associations — he would no longer provide samples for the collection. “I try to raise awareness about climate change and the impact of climate change and how to help people fight this issue,” Gündoğdu said. Sending his samples to the Science Museum goes against that message, he said.

But museum officials say Shell sponsorship has no influence on how it collects or displays artifacts. “We completely reject the false allegation that our curators are in any way prevented from performing their essential role in an expert, independent, and thorough manner,” said a spokesperson for the Science Museum Group. The spokesperson added that the museum retains full editorial control over the content of its exhibits and galleries and does not agree to any relationship that prevents the pursuit of its mission of collecting material or producing exhibitions.

“Curators are constantly discussing current research with scientists to help identify the right things to get. This is just the beginning of a lengthy process that involves completely internal ones. discussion and research before a formal acquisition is made, ”said Tilly Blyth, head of collections and chief curator at the Science Museum. “We respect the right of any individual to decide if they want to work with us by donating items to the national collection.”

Shell also denied that its sponsorship of the climate change exhibition undermined the Science Museum’s independence. “We fully respect the freedom of the museum. That’s why it’s important to exhibit about carbon capture and why we support it. Debate and discussion – among anyone who sees it – is important, ”said a Shell spokesperson. In 2020, Shell’s self -reported greenhouse gas emissions were added to 1.38 billion metric tons equivalent to carbon dioxide — more than four times that annual emissions across the UK. According to the environmental love Client Land, Shell’s planned emissions between 2018 and 2030 alone will account for nearly 1.6 percent of the global carbon budget, the amount of carbon that can be released into the atmosphere while keeping global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius.

The Science Museum is involved in a series of controversies surrounding sponsorship from Shell for our Future Planet exhibit, which will last until September 2022. The exhibition focuses on technologies — including carbon capture and tree planting– that can be used to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, but the sponsorship has attracted heavy criticism for allegedly greenwashing Shell’s significant contribution to the climate crisis. Extraction and burning of fossil fuels is the most important contribution to global warming.

In September, the Science Museum said it would remove from the exhibition a placard made by a student for a climate protest in March 2019. The placard was collected after a march in London in which an estimated 10,000 young people -on gathered to protest the government’s inaction on climate change. change. The decision to remove the placard was made in response to a open letter from the UK Student Climate Network, which asked for the placard to be removed, as the young people donating it had not yet been notified of Shell’s sponsorship.



Source link

admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *