Video: How cheap is innovation and growing activism changing climate politics
The measures will mark the country’s first fundamental climate laws if they pass something close to their current form. More notably, they have joined the Clean Electricity Operation Program, which uses fees and penalties to encourage utilities to increase their share of electricity from carbon-free sources (read our previous post- aw HERE).
The other speakers on the panel, have a title Cleaning the Energy Sector, was advised to create such a program. With them Leah Stokes, an associate professor focusing on energy and climate policy at the University of California, Santa Barbara; and Jesse Jenkins, an assistant professor and researcher in energy systems at Princeton University.
They argued during the session that the bill, designed to ensure 80% of the country’s electricity comes from clean sources by 2030, would be more effective and politically viable than competing methods, including a carbon tax. favored by many economists.
“If… we tell people,‘ We’re making it more expensive to use a very important thing, which is energy, ’that’s not very popular,” Stokes said. “That theory of political change contradicts the reality that the country’s income is not equal.”
“A different example is to say,‘ Rather than making the use of fossil fuels more expensive, let’s help make the use of clean things cheaper, ’” he added.
Although it is known if the clean measure of electricity and other climate provisions will pass, and in what form. Even some Democratic senators narrowly divided Congress pushed back what they present as excessive spending on fees.
For all the advances on climate issues, well-funded and influential political and fossil-fuel interests continue to hinder efforts to fix energy systems at the speed and speed required, burdened Julian Brave Noisecat, vice president of policy and strategy at Data for Progress, who presided at the session.