The Alcoholic Risk of Breast Cancer Not to Be Discussed
Martinez has never organized a social media campaign and he is not considered to be social media savvy. But after ARG won the $ 100,000 grant, he ran focus groups, coordinated a group of consultants with cancer organizations, formed a group of fellow investigators and fellow communications specialist. in ARG. “The young women made it clear that they didn’t want them to be told what to do,” Martinez said of the focus groups. “‘ Drinking less for your breasts ’seems like a helpful suggestion.”
Planning for the social media campaign began just as the pandemic forced a national shutdown. As the pandemic continued, alcohol consumption increased especially among women. Days of heavy drinking among women, defined as four or more drinks in an hour or two, increased by 41 percent, according to a survey by RAND Corporation. (The study compared a baseline survey of 1,540 adults conducted in the spring of 2019 to their responses to a follow-up in the spring of 2020.)
But pushing against alcohol consumption is not simple. As found in the U.S. during the destructive ban from 1920 to 1933, anti-alcoholism was unpopular. When Sharima Rasanayagam, chief scientist for the Breast Cancer Prevention Partnership in San Francisco, gave a talk about the environmental causes of breast cancer, her audience collapsed — until she mentioned alcohol. “People want to drink and they don’t want to hear that,” he said. He told them that quantity was important: “At least, at least drink.”
It’s a message she shows with caution, to avoid giving women reason to blame themselves when they get breast cancer and wonder “Why me?” Breast cancer cases cannot be linked to alcohol alone, because many factors, including genetics and environmental exposure, contribute to the disease, she explained in YouTube video linked to the Breast Cancer Prevention Partners website. But Rasanayagam says the risks are increasing – and alcohol is one that women can underestimate. Smaller drinks, either over time or in a day, mean less acetaldehyde and possibly less estrogen effects. “It has been shown that the less you drink, the lower your risk,” he says. (Breast Cancer Prevention Partners is a Minus Drink advisor for your Breasts campaign.)
It’s a nuanced message but, in itself in this way, bold, as framed in a social media campaign, said David Jernigan, an alcohol policy expert at Boston University, who works in the field at 35 year. “What Priscilla did in California broke ground,” he said.
Jernigan stated that the damage from alcohol—Which is also associated with drunk driving and association with violence-confirms a large response similar to anti-tobacco efforts. He recalls that in Estonia, a campaign called for “Drink a little in the middle!” actually lowered consumption per capita at 28 percent. (Estonia’s alcohol policy also includes advertising bans, greater enforcement of driving laws under the influence, higher taxes, and a focus on treatment.)
The World Health Organization is also developing one plan to move the world; the current draft sets a goal to reduce per capita consumption by 20 percent by 2030 (with the 2010 consumption level as the baseline). It urges nations to develop and implement “highly impactful options,” such as higher alcohol taxes, advertising bans, and emphasizes awareness of health risks.
Jernigan called the effort a good move that wasn’t enough to come by. He favored the development of an international treaty on alcohol, similar to “Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, “The first agreement was reached by the World Health Organization. It was signed by 168 countries pledging to take measures to curb tobacco advertising, raise cigarette taxes, and curb smoking among young people.