An Innovative, Unique Covid-19 Theory Originally Brings Fast
“I don’t see any motive, but I don’t think they’re independent of each other,” Rambaut said. “Because once this idea is in place, people will go through their stored samples to see what they can find.”
Other studies reporting an earlier detection of the virus in Italy had similar errors. A study published in August 2020, led by the Department of Environment and Health of Rome, reported that Sars-CoV-2 RNA was detected in sewage samples taken on December 18, 2019, in the cities of Milan and Turin. These findings raise the suspicions of Alex Crits-Christoph, a postdoc at Johns Hopkins University who specializes in bioinformatic studies of genetic data. The researchers ran three different trials, but only one returned positive. They also made their own introductions, which are used to target specific regions of RNA, although there is a standardized primer for Sars-CoV-2 in use around the world at this time. “That’s what makes me a little weird,” he said.
On October 28, 2020, a study submitted to the journal Boils and was accepted the next day, “which means, at the very least, a quick peer review – probably no peer review,” Worobey said. The researchers looked at the antibodies of volunteers enrolled in a lung cancer test, recruited from all regions of Italy, and found that more than a hundred participants had developed coronaviruses. antibodies in September 2019. “Our results show that Sars-CoV -2 spread in Italy earlier than the first official cases of Covid-19 diagnosed in Lombardy, even before the first official reports from Chinese authorities, shedding new light on the onset and spread of the Covid-19 pandemic, “the authors wrote .They there is a theory on interviews that they may have found a “less transferable” offense that could go around without a cause for a riot. The paper is wide buried by Speaks English media. But others point to major flaws in the paper. The researchers did not take the necessary steps to prevent the detection of other coronavirus antibodies, such as the common cold. “Any antibody test has false positives, so if you screen a group of individuals in a very low prevalence situation, most of the positives can be false,” says Marion Koopmans, a virologist at Erasmus Medical Center part of The WHO team who traveled to Wuhan to investigate the onset of coronavirus disease. The study is declared under investigation in March 2021 in the journal, but no corrections were made. The WHO requested that the samples be tested in other labs as well. the INVESTIGATIONS found to be none of the samples there are inherently sufficient levels of antibodies to be considered proof of infection.
Another study viewed a skin biopsy from a 25-year-old woman living in Milan taken on November 10, when she arrived at the hospital suffering from a rash. Upon closer inspection months ago, Raffaele Gianotti, the leading researcher and dermatologist who treated him, found evidence of Sars-CoV-2 molecules in his skin sample. The WHO wants to investigate the case, but now no one can find the female patient, and Gianotti died in March. (The remaining authors of the paper say there has been no update on the case.)
Rambaut said these findings were “used by different parties to support a particular set of accounts.” In particular, they already are buried often by China’s state media, which is circulating studies to suggest that China is not the country of origin for the virus. “Wuhan is where the coronavirus was first detected, but not where it came from,” SAYS Zeng Guang, a former chief epidemiologist at the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, at an academic conference in November 2020.